Wednesday, October 22, 2014
PPP: Balancing Equity and Efficiency
Another article I wrote for Spontaneous Order:
http://spontaneousorder.in/ppp-balancing-equity-and-efficiency/
http://spontaneousorder.in/ppp-balancing-equity-and-efficiency/
Monday, May 19, 2014
Is Market Riding High on Black Money Spent in Election?
Here is link of the blogpost I wrote for spontaneous order:
http://spontaneousorder.in/is-market-riding-high-on-black-money-spent-in-election/
http://spontaneousorder.in/is-market-riding-high-on-black-money-spent-in-election/
Thursday, August 8, 2013
Supremacy of Politics: Telangana
Telangana has been in news
recently after the decision by the Government of India to make it 29th
state of the country. I had a conversation with few friends about the decision
and discussing various factors on the basis of which the decision of forming a
new state is taken. The factors during our discussion ranged from backwardness
to ease of administration to states too big to govern to language and cultural
identity. However, in my opinion formation of the state has once again proved supremacy
of politics over all other factors. Had the decision been taken based on the
above mentioned grounds there are genuine demands of formation of other new
states such as Gorkhaland, Bodoland, Purvanchal, Avadh Pradesh, Bundelkhand,
Vidarbh, Maru Pradesh and many more. The current count of demand of new states
could take the number of states in the country to 50. Ironically, demand of few
such states has involved even violence and insurgence and the magnitude of the
matter has increased after the decision on Telangana. The question is what is
it that makes Telangana a unique case for bagging the status of a new state and
others not to qualify? I join the group of many who believe the recent decision
makes a stronger case of politics rather than the development of the region
which should ideally be the case. Indian National Congress has taken the decision
to harvest political advantage in the upcoming Lok Sabha election. The recent
decision also raises the question of having a uniform method based on
principles for all such demands instead of taking decisions as a favor for
political gain or other vested interests.
The government has declined the
request of creating ‘State Reorganization Commission’ which in my opinion is
anti-democratic and against the constitution of India. I am of the opinion of
creating ‘State Reorganization Commission’ with immediate effect to look into demands
in greater details taking a decision based on the above mentioned factors to control
the raising violence. May be all the demands can’t be accepted but as many of
those can be, should be. There are concerns raised by some thought leaders such
as danger to the unity and integrity which is beyond my understanding. People
are mostly concerned for the basic services reaching to them and not so
specifically whether it comes from central, state or local government
irrespective of its size and functioning etc. Only when development and public
services for long time didn’t reach to people, they realized that in the
current political set up their interest wouldn’t be looked into in lack of
appropriate representation and political advantages and started demanding separate
state which better represents them. There are several advantages of having a small
state which even comes as learning from Chattishgarh, Uttakhand and Jharkhand. And
even if the policy makers don’t see many advantages, they need to respect the
sentiments of people in Indian democracy. While their concerns can be too small
states making it difficult to administer rather than giving it ease, I am sure
people would also learn from their mistake and will also demand for
unification. We do have a wonderful example of European Union to learn from
where countries voluntarily decided to come together to make a larger union.
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Issaq
Issaq reminds me of my days far
from home. One day, I was trying to cook dinner with my mom’s constant guidance
on phone. I had all the good quality ingredients, followed the process and did
everything according to the instructions. While I thought I had done a
wonderful job, when I sat down to eat with my friends I found the meal insipid.
I wasn’t an expert cook and that’s why I was clueless as to why the food wasn’t
tasty. Similarly the movie, in my opinion, has good story line, hard working
team, actors who have done fairly good job with their roles, wonderful background
of Varanasi, dialogues and scripting that gives it close-to-reality touch and even
some good music too. However, the film is insipid and hardly connects to
audience. I am not an expert movie critic and that’s why once again I fail to
understand why so. What magic my mom does to food and I can’t do is the similar
to what magic some expert film makers do what Manish Tiwari fails to do.
I think what product sells today in
market depends upon its user friendliness. One would fail to understand logic
and sequence of the incidents unless he is much focused (and in many cases not
even then). I didn’t like at all unnecessary humor added. In fact it actually ruins
the work. There circumstantial incidents that brings out humor and we enjoy it,
not just to make it funny. By the way I liked the work of all the actors in the
movie and the Benaras it has portrayed to some extent. The movie can be
watched as several small clips by the students who learn film making but if you
go to see it as entire movie, one would certainly be disappointed. Therefore, I
find the film maker has wasted all the great talent the movie had to make it a
wonderful movie in the same way as I wasted quality ingredients trying to
prepare dinner.
Directed by: Manish Tiwary, Produced
by: Dhaval Gada, Shailesh R. Singh.
Starring: Prateik Babbar, Amyra
Dastur, Ravi Kishan, Makarand Deshpande, Neena Gupta, Prashant Narayanan, Sudhir
Pandey, Prashant Kumar, Amit Sial, Vineet Kumar, Yuri Suri, Malini Awasthy.
Music by: Sachin – Jigar, Krsna, Sachinn
Gupta.
Background score: Prashant Pillai
Cinematography: Vishal Sinha
Studio: Pen India Pvt. Ltd
Release date(s): 26 July 2013
Country: India
Language: Hindi
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
From Mid Day Maut to Food Tragedy
Since I am on break from work and
get enough spare time to do things I have always longed for doing. One of the
things that I make sure I do is to spend time with youth around my neighborhood.
It helps me to understand more about what youth of a third tier cities these
days, at the same time it also helps me share my learning to enrich their
experience.
One fine evening I was on evening
stroll of the town with one of boys of my neighborhood. While we passed the
stinking public garbage, the boy was compelled to think of some solution to
solve the problem which erupted an intense discussion among us which I think
needs to be shared with others too. The discussion also is significant to other
issues of contemporary public policy discourse in approaching election
environment. While the boy immediately came out with his hypothetical solution
of government doing more to solve to the problem of public garbage, I was more
focused on helping him think of an alternate solution. Here is a sneak pick of
our conversation:
Boy: The stinking garbage causes
so much inconvenience to people. Government must do something about it.
Me: Why government should work on
it?
Boy: Because it’s government’s
responsibility to clean our garbage.
Me: Isn’t it our responsibility
to clean our garbage.
Boy: Yes, but government has
taken up this responsibility and has staffs to do so. We even pay for this.
Me: You are right. Government has
an entire big department to maintain cleanliness in town and even after paying
for this we don’t get satisfactory result. Doesn’t this give us a learning?
Boy: What do you mean?
Me: We usually in our personal
life give more responsibilities to the ones who give us good result and curb
the responsibilities of the ones who fail to deliver. Applying the same logic
shouldn’t we take away the responsibility from government and figure out
another way to maintain cleanliness and shouldn’t we even punish the government
for failing to deliver? The thing is the moment we say government should do
this or that, we must understand that we are making an expectation from an inefficient
system to deliver which has never delivered. Can you give me an example of any
public service delivery work where government has done really well?
Boy: Well, I am not sure if there
is any such thing.
Me: Right. I am not sure whether
this big stinking garbage existed here and how it was managed before government
took over the responsibility of garbage management but I am very sure that the
more you put this on government, the bigger would be the size of garbage management
problem here.
While I tried to explain the boy
what should be core function of government and what should be put back to civil
society to do on its own, I got more examples from recent crisis to substantiate
my point. One of the flagship schemes of government to provide Mid-Day Meal to
students in government schools happened to prove killer for more than two dozen
school students recently. News channels have filled up the screen with numerous
stories of how inefficiently the scheme is managed since the incident took
place. MNREGA has spread the corruption from big offices in city/state centers
to far away rural areas. Practically, it
can be seen as the largest government program in world to decentralize
corruption. And now I am wondering what would happen with the attempt of
providing Food Security to us. Can anyone guess how this act can kick off
artificial food grain shortage, inflation rate, budget deficit, politics
entering into our daily personal lives, increase in corrupt practices and most
importantly how many lives it would claim? It would be very interesting to
calculate actual price that the country would have to pay for few Kilograms of subsidized
food grains…
Labels:
Amit Chandra,
Food Security,
Mid Day Meal,
Public Garbage
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
A Simple Way to Explain Evils of Socialism
An economics professor at a local University made a statement
that he had never failed a single student before, but had recently failed an
entire class. That class had insisted that socialism worked and that no
one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.
The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment
in this class on the socialism principles".. All grades will be averaged
and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will
receive an A.... (Substituting grades for Ranks - something closer to home and
more readily understood by all).
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone
got a B. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied
little were HAPPY. As the second test rolled around, the students who studied
little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted
a free ride too so they studied little.
The second test average was a D! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the average was an F.
As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as
bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would
study for the benefit of anyone else.
To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told
them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is
great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward
away, no one will try or want to succeed.
Labels:
Capitalism,
Socialism
Location:
Mughal Sarai, Uttar Pradesh, India
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)